This, as a Christian Conservative does not sit well with me. Not because I am against gays or them being together. But I have a question for this. Okay, they are going to set benefits for gay couples now. So once they do this, what is to stop them from making a rule for benefits for three people living together? Or four? Essentially, what they are doing now is redefining marriage. Marriage from God is between a man and a woman. No matter how much mankind wants to change that, in God’s eyes, it’s always going to be that. As well it should.
But if this is really true, are the going to single out same sex couples, which goes against the law of the state, and then if that happens, what about heterosexual couples that aren’t married?
This bill is set up to give benefits to homosexual couples, who are not married. In Indiana it is against the law for gay couples to marry. But going with this bill, John and Jim as a couple will have the right to the same benefits that a married couple has. What about heterosexual couples who are not married? See the slippery slope here?
Now this question was asked by Greg Garrison on his show this morning. And remember he is a lawyer, and he brought this up.
My best friend and I have been best buddy’s since about the 2nd grade, and until we hit high school as seniors, we were almost inseparable. Now we were not intimate because we never had sex, but that means, with this bill, that if it is passed, we cannot as a couple of committed friends do not have the same benefits as a gay couple would have. Why? And be careful with your answer here, because it is nothing more than the democrats are doing by redefining marriage and the benefits due. This nation is already broke and our governments are working to make more government spending? We have to realize here that all the money the government spends and gives out in welfare and benefits is not coming from the government. It comes from you and me. Right out of our pocketbooks, paychecks and bank accounts. Where is it going to stop?
Like I said, it’s a slippery slope and once it has been traversed with one rule, another one is sure to follow. They are never satisfied with getting what they want. They always want more. But there is more to think about.
If the people do not overwhelmingly override this bill, and let the government know that it isn’t wanted, we have more of the same coming our way. You see, democrats and liberals do not take a shallow loss, as a loss like we do. They take it as a temporary stoppage, that will only take a little bit of work to get it to pass.
The democrats are notorious when it comes to losing. They don’t take losing well, and when they lose, they go back to the drawing board and figure out what they did wrong, and next time use what they learned…..usually with good results, for them. Remember the Obama presidential election? The other day Obama said, he wished his opponent was McCain. We have them on the ropes, but I digress.
City Government liberals are the same as national party liberals. They learn from their mistakes and come back with a better plan. So if the people do not let the city council know under no uncertain terms that this new bill isn’t acceptable, the democrats will come back next time with the right changes to get it passed. That is what we can take to the bank here. We have to let the city council know under no uncertain terms that this is totally unacceptable.
May God Bless our efforts to help get America back, and put God back into our country
God Bless America, Bless all Americans, and bless us to start using more common sense.