Obama has been saying all kinds of things lately, and mostly it is about how he is doing everything he can to help America. Kind of sounds like another president we used to have. That president was Ronald Reagan. Now I am not saying that these two are the same, by any stretch of the imagination. Both of them said that they wanted to help America, but that is where the siimilarities ended.
Obama said that America is the greatest country in the world, won’t you join me in changing it.
Reagan said, “We cannot escape our destiny, nor should we try to do so. The leadership of the free world was thrust upon us two centuries ago in that little hall of Philadelphia. In the days following World War II, when the economic strength and power of America was all that stood between the world and the return to the dark ages, Pope Pius XII said, “The American people have a great genius for splendid and unselfish actions. Into the hands of America God has placed the destinies of an afflicted mankind.”
The main difference between Reagan and Obama, is this. Reagan believed in America. Reagan believed that America and Americans could do anything if the effort was put forth do to it. Obama, does not think of the greatness of America, but instead thinks of the greatness of Obama. It is as the Weekly Standard said, in a post called: Reagan and Obama
Is America a city on a hill or a country in decline?
by Jean Kaufman
10/07/2009 12:00:00 AM
Ronald Reagan believed in America.
One way he expressed this faith was through the image of “a shining city on a hill,” a phrase Reagan uttered in one form or another in many of his speeches, including his 1989 Farewell Address in which he said, “I’ve spoken of the shining city all my political life.” It was an expression with religious as well as historical origins, and referred to American exceptionalism.
In a 1974 speech Reagan expanded on America’s special place among nations:
…I have always believed that there was some divine plan that placed this great continent between two oceans to be sought out by those who were possessed of an abiding love of freedom and a special kind of courage…
Somehow America has bred a kindliness into our people unmatched anywhere…We are not a sick society. A sick society could not produce the men that set foot on the moon…
We cannot escape our destiny, nor should we try to do so. The leadership of the free world was thrust upon us two centuries ago in that little hall of Philadelphia. In the days following World War II, when the economic strength and power of America was all that stood between the world and the return to the dark ages, Pope Pius XII said, “The American people have a great genius for splendid and unselfish actions. Into the hands of America God has placed the destinies of an afflicted mankind.”
This sort of inspirational talk by Reagan really got the left’s goat. His speeches expressed with deep conviction his love for this country, his belief in its special destiny, and his respect for its position as world leader for good rather than ill, all couched in language that drew unashamed and unembarrassed inspiration from religion. There is little doubt that he believed every word he said, then and during his two-term presidency.
Fast forward to Obama, another president who is considered by many to be an inspirational orator. But he inspires a very different group of people with a very different vision of America.
Obama may not be speaking in openly religious terms as Reagan did, but he nevertheless looks on America in a way that could be seen as religious: he sees it as a nation conceived in original sin, one that has gone on to commit offenses against the world for which it must now atone. And Obama views himself as the special instrument through which America can finally purify herself, join the world of other nations as an equal rather than a leader, and go forth and sin no more.
You might say that Reagan believed in American exceptionalism, whereas Obama believes in Obama’s exceptionalism.
Once a person starts to look at Obama from that perspective, nearly everything he says and does seems to fit the pattern. For example, in a radio interview he gave in 2001, Obama was already explicit about America’s original sin of slavery, as well as the fact that he believed that the sin (he called it a “fundamental flaw”) was still ongoing and unresolved at the time he spoke:
“The original Constitution … is an imperfect document, and I think it is a document that reflects some deep flaws in American culture, the Colonial culture nascent at that time. … I think we can say that the Constitution reflected an enormous blind spot in this culture that carries on until this day, and that the Framers had that same blind spot. I don’t think the two views are contradictory, to say that it was a remarkable political document that paved the way for where we are now, and to say that it also reflected the fundamental flaw of this country that continues to this day.”
After that one, I think nothing more needs to be said, except, there is no comparison between the America loving Reagan, and the Obama loving Obama. NUFF SAID.
God Bless America, her troops and her people
God Bless my readers, my listeners on BTR and my viewers on You Tube