AARP = Armed and Really Pissed……

OH YEAHHHHH Make my Day!!

OH YEAHHHHH! Make my day!

This little photo card says it all folks. I am really pissed…and I am armed. The government had better sit up and take notice. This country was founded on the premise of men (and women) being free to do the things they want and live the life they want, legally. But now the Government is taking that freedom away from us, with the premise that we are too stupid to know what is best for us and our lives and our families. See the problem? Hence, the neat AARP card that I posted here. I want the government to know that I am sick and tired of them always putting down America and always praising America’s enemies. I want them to know that I am sick and tired of them telling me that Christianity is wrong and that we are more a muslim nation than a christian nation anyway. To that I say BULLPUCKY!

This country was founded on Christian values, and we have even had one of our first presidents who read the Quaran! Not to learn about becoming a Muslim, but to find out what to shield America from. Yes that is right. Thomas Jefferson read the Quaran.

I am tired of the Politicians in Washington, who are there to support America and defend her, telling the whole world that everything that is wrong in the world is our fault. It is not our fault. And looking at the world when disasters hit proves it.

Who do they turn too? They turn to America for help. And who is the one that always, without question, helps? America of course. But even though this nation is always going out of it’s way to help someone in trouble, we are the cause for everything ill that inflicts the whole world. And I am getting sick and tired of that. Because America is not the one that beheads someone for not being the way we are. America doesn’t kill someone just for believing in something different.

But it is getting so bad now, that our own government, under Barack Hussein Obama, is turning away from God and our allies! How sick can one country get?

Now, I know that America is not to blame for all the bad in this world. If you want to see what is bad about America now……read this. I know that even though you will deny this you liberals, deep down you know this to be true:

Obama’s First 100 days

If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given Tony Blair a set of inexpensive and useless (to Tony Blair’s UK video formatting) DVDs, when Tony Blair had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the non-existent “Austrian language,” would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?

If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?

Obama’s done all this in his first 10 weeksso you’ll have three years and nine-and-a-half months to come up with an answer.

Now I ask you, would you have approved? I can answer that one for you, because your very actions during the Bush Presidency answers it for us all. NO YOU WOULDN’T HAVE! You would have claimed every one of those to be impeachable offenses. You would have said that Bush broke the law. Of course you would have brought up the liberal point that Bush stole the election and really wasn’t the president.

We conservatives have always had to put up with that, yet when we criticize something Obama is doing, then we are unpatriotic and shouldn’t say things against our president, forgetting, that is all you did for 8 years!

You people need to get a real life, Stop trying to make us all live the one that you dwell in 24-7.

Mainly because we want none of Your socialistic world. We want America back. We want our God Back. We want what the founding fathers gave us. We want the Constitution back. We want our Country Back.

God Bless America and our Troops
God Bless my readers, my listeners on BTR and my viewers on You Tube….


About Robert P. Garding

I am a Reagan Conservative, who is very alarmed at the Liberals who have just lost their majority over our government, but continue to act like it never happened. They have to be stopped. NOW or even sooner.
This entry was posted in Conservative Talk Blog host. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to AARP = Armed and Really Pissed……

  1. Seane-Anna says:

    Great photo! And the 100 Days list is right to the point. Every one of those things would’ve been denounced as crimes against humanity if Bush had done them. I’m not armed, my friend, but I am pissed and if I get any madder I WILL arm myself. Watch out liberals!

    reply from Robert: I am armed, something that my wife insisted on. Especially since I am so public with the blog and my BTR show and the videos. But that is where this nation has to watch itself. We are becoming a nation of people who want to follow the laws but are forced the other way, and people in charge who do not care about the law.

  2. MD says:

    Shame on you Obama, who is not black or white, but a chameleon… Except when to take side of your friend against the hardworking men and women from the Cambridge Police Department and called them stupid… Did George W. Bush or any previous President EVER did that? Now I ask, who’s the racist? I never heard any first lady saying she was never proud of America before… And last but not least, what’s up with the african-American statement? You’re either african or American, choose a side and STAY on that side… you want the cake and you want to eat it too…

  3. Owen Miller says:

    Too bad they are a liberal organization….
    That’s why we dumped them.
    reply from Robert: I know. I have never had them though they have been actively pursuing me. I am leaning towards another one that is I think AHMA or something like that. I will do a post about them soon.

  4. Mike says:

    Hi . You guys are funny. 3 + years and this odious government that you hate hasn’t shut you down. Keep it up.
    You make a lot of ridiculous assumptions. Like that “conservatives” are the only ones out there who are “Armed and Pissed.” Guess what, I am both and I do not fit your definition of ‘conservative’ which apparently excludes anyone who isn’t a racist, homophobic, religious wackjob.
    Don’t F*** with me and I won’t F*** with you
    thanks for listening.
    reply from Robert: I never said it was just the conservatives who are “Armed and Pissed.” I know a lot of people are on both sides of the isle here. And the main reason most are pissed is because of the destruction that our country has undergone in the last three years, plus, the damage that it has sustained over the last 50 years. The only thing, is now it is getting to the point where if we do not do something about it now, it will soon become too late to save this great nation. I know a lot of democrats who agree with me. And I also know a lot of republicans who do not. And you’re welcome for listening. I hope you return the favor.
    I just know that as long as the government doesn’t shut me down, I will continue just like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and all the others out here who are making noise to save this nation from the tyranny that is happening on many levels here today. I do not do this to be funny, though many think so, I do not do this to be well known, and so far that isn’t happening. I am not, and it wouldn’t bother me if I never became well known…..or a celebrity. I just want to do my part to bring America back to the greatness that she had, and I know, will have again. I will continue to do what I have been doing…..researching, and finding out just what is really happening and then posting it.

  5. Mike says:

    I’m listening. All I hear from Rush and Sean is a bunch of noise and name calling (“slut” worked real well, didn’t it? Just wrote off 50% of your market).
    No, it’s not funny. Sad really.

    reply from Robert: I don’t think that 50% of my market is gone because of the use of a word that in all respects of the way it was used was right. If she wasn ‘t a slut why would it matter if the government paid for her contraceptives? The government shouldn’t have to provide free anything. After all, whenever they do that, we are the ones paying for it. NOT THE GOVERNMENT. And most of the name calling is coming from the left, if you are really listening.

  6. Mike says:

    Ps I came to your site because I REALLY like that poster. And Clint. He was in town (Athens GA) by the way the other day.
    reply from Robert: I would have loved to have been there to see him. I have always liked Clint Eastwood.

  7. Mike says:

    I think you meant “aisle” not “isle” unless you were talking about an island, and not one of the 2 parties in Congress….
    reply from Robert: Yes I did mean “aisle”, and thanks for the correction. I missed the “a”.

  8. Mike says:


    Please get your facts straight. Here they are:
    – Sandra Fluke was tesitifying before Congress, as in *invited*. I guess Rush is upset they didn’t invite him.
    — The matter she was testifying about was a requirement that would require private employers (not the government) to treat contraceptives like other prescription medications from the standpoint of benefits. Nothing to do with the government ‘paying for contraceptives’. As for free– ever hear of co-pay? It’s not free.
    — As far as I know (why don’t you check me on this?) Georgetown U. (the employer in question) would not disallow benefits for Viagra prescriptions. So much for “religious discrimination”
    So maybe you disagree with all this. Fine. Doesn’t entitle you or Mr. Limbaugh to call Ms. Fluke a slut. If you do, please don’t expect us to listen.
    reply from Robert: It is always wrong to call someone a slut, true, but to act like she is going and saying that she needs to have “free” contraceptives shows the world where her mind is. As for what I believe here, look at what Seane Anna had to say in a reply to you. I agree with her.

  9. Seane-Anna says:

    Mike, I believe it was wrong for Rush to call Ms. Fluke a slut. However, it was also wrong for Ed Schultz to call Laura Ingraham a slut, and for Bill Maher to call Sarah Palin a cunt–yes, I did write the word–yet, when that and other nasty, misogynist slurs were thrown at conservative women by liberal talking heads, no one of the Left had a nervous breakdown and declared that a “war on women” had been unleashed. That tells me, Mike, that all the outrage being dumped on Rush by liberals now is 100% FAKE. They’re simply using this trumped up “attack” on the nation’s females to try and shut Rush down BECAUSE THEY DO NOT LIKE OPPOSING SPEECH. That is what this is really all about.

    And as for the contraceptive issue itself, you’re right, it’s not about government giving women birth control for free. Rather, it’s about the government mandating that private companies provide their employees with insurance policies that cover free contraceptives, EVEN IF THE PRIVATE COMPANY IS RUN BY A RELIGIOUS DENOMINATION THAT OPPOSES CONTRACEPTIVES. It’s that mandate, and the complete disregarding of religious freedom, that conservatives are vehemently opposed to. If a private company chooses, of its own free will, to provide its employees with insurance that covers birth control, fine. But the federal government is overstepping its bounds to order them to do so. That is a HUGE power grab that we conservatives have no intention of letting the federal government get away with, no matter what. And finally, not wanting to pay for her own contraceptives may not make a woman a slut but it does make her too irresponsible to be having sex.
    reply from Robert: Listen to this lady Mike. She has one of the clearest minds of anyone I have ever had the pleasure to know. I too agree that it was wrong of Rush to call her a slut, but, if the shoe fits……and as Seane Anna said, if she is so irresponsible that she wants all the rest of us to pay for her right to have sex, then I also think that she is too irresponsible to have sex. PERIOD! Thanks Seane Anna for the thoughtful insight into this.

  10. Mike says:


    Oh please… “It was wrong …… but I’m sorry but if the shoe fits” . So was it wrong, or not?

    Hmm- In other words, private employers have the right to control the sexual behavior of their employees. All they have to do is claim “religious concience” . How is this “conservative”? Well, see below

    Honestly this all smacks of control by social (as opposed to fiscal conservatives). At least you all could be consistent, which would mean:

    a) you would oppose government interference AND government support of religion (like tax breaks for “religious organizations” who run businesses that have nothing to do with their religious missions
    b) you would quite claiming that America is a Christian nation and demanding special status for Christian organizations (well unless they aren’t “real Christians”, like Mormons or Unitarians)
    c) you would oppose government “paying for abortions” AND government telling women what do do with their bodies
    d) you would return to core Republican values of small government, fiscal responsibility, and limited militarism that seem to have been abandonded in favor of cramming so called Christian values down the rest of our throats.
    e) You would quite being such raving idiots about REASONABLE restrictions on firearms use and possession . I say this last as a multiple firearm owner and hunter.
    f) You quit embarrassing yourselves and America by putting forth an anti-intellectual, anti-science rhetoric denying well established science (as in, proven, and used everyday in medicine) like evolution. Not sure what you think about the cell theory (“it’s only a theory”).
    g) Quit justifying name calling on the right because someone on the left does it. I don’t like them either and say so (but this site somehow seems likely to reach them).
    h) Also I am going to anticipate that you will try to rebut a-e above by saying (for at least some items): the left/ Democrats (not the same thing of course) do it too. For example, I am no fan of Obama when it comes to war or civil liberties. Ditto the “war on drugs”. Double ditto on fiscal policy. It IS kind of funny though that he has turned into some kind of socialist boogeyman for you guys. If only…

    Anyway, I used to take conservatives seriously, when they actually made sense and had something useful to bring to the discussion. I could even -DID even –vote for such a conservative on occasion, just to keep the other side honest. Then Bill Buckley died and the rest of the sane ones seem to have gone extinct or into hiding and Rush is your leader. Maybe things will turn around after the disaster you about to experience in November (I really wanted to see Obama work harder for it, believe me…).

    reply from Robert: Committed to the cause no matter how close the cliff looms? Guess you didn’t read the comment aimed at you. Oh well. What will you say when the disaster in November is with Obama and the liberals losing office? Guess we will see.
    PS — Still waiting for the answer on Viagra. Meantime, I hope those irresponsible men out there just find some other outlets. So to speak.

  11. Mike says:

    sorry for poor typing. “quite” needs to be replaced by “quit” in several places.

  12. Mike says:


    Since Obama isn’t a liberal by any definition that still has meaning, I guess he’s safe.

    Well perhaps you missed MY point. I am fine with opposing viewpoints but I’d prefer ones that are a bit more civil and intelligent. But if not, I’m not going to get in the way while they knock each other off. Here’s how I see it:

    It is Spring in the re-election year of an incumbent president. He has some baggage (mainly his pigmentation) but largely has done a competent if not thrilling job. He inherited 2 wars and a fiscal mess (his predecessor, by contract, had no wars and was on his way to a budget surplus when he took office). The economy is starting to slowly climb out of the toilet it sank into before he was elected. He approved the successful operation to kill the terrorist that his predecessor failed to find while he was starting an unrelated war (your side likes to keep lying about that last one).

    The opposition, instead of focussing on the economoy or foreign affairs, talks about faith, guns, abortion, evolution, Al Gore (who?), and sluts (the last through their propagandists at Faux) and uses a thinly-veiled racial rhetoric against the first Black (well sort of) president (“Food Stamp President” says Newt although a) the vast majority of food stamp recipients are white, b) many are in Georgia, and c) the food stamp program is as much a farm subsidy as a welfare program). The front runner is a businessman who never held a real job and his biggest success financially came from churning through companies, many of whom went bankrupt and proceeded to lay off their employees or send jobs overseas. He is a devout member of a faith that most Christians in the South do not recognize as Christian and a lot of Americans think is a cult. In second place is a Catholic (another faith many southern Christians don’t recognize) who believes in literal bible truth and who thinks America should be a theocracy (Christian, natch). In third or somewhere is a former Speaker of the House who resigned in disgrace after a failed attempt to remove a president for doing what he has been (serially) doing for 30 years, and is on his third marriage. He has recently converted to Catholicism (see above). Each of these gentlemen is outdoing the other to see how far to the right they can go, rhetorically speaking,mostly on social issues, and just how close to the line they (or their minions) can come without actually using the N—- word but making sure even the densest of us get the code.

    Then one of the pack, presumably #1 above, gets the nomination in August or so. Finally. Out comes the Etch-A-Sketch (I love it— liberals didn’t have to say that. Mitt’s guy, bless his heart!). “We didn’t really mean all that. The rest of you should really, really trust us to run the country and not act like the Christian Taliban if elected. We were just saying that so our wack-job fringe would support us. We know they will in the general election (otherwise they’d have to vote for the n—–).” Trouble is, they will have 2 months to make that case, having spent the rest of 2012 and the lead up making the opposite one. Good luck with that.

    Robert, if I were to meet you in person I would shake your hand, buy you a beer, and place you a friendly bet (like a round for you and all your buddies) that Obama is re-elected by at least 100 electoral votes. It will NOT be a late election night.


  13. Seane-Anna says:

    Mike, you wrote a lot so I’ll limit myself to a reply to a couple of points.

    First, yes Obama inherited economic problems, but please explain how that makes him not responsible for the economic mess that’s happened as a result of HIS policies? You call Robert “anti-intellectual”, yet how intellectual is to blame a man for fiscal and economic failures that happened AFTER HE LEFT OFFICE?! I mean, if everything bad now is Bush’s fault, why aren’t they also Clinton’s fault? And Bush 1’s fault? And Carter’s fault? I mean, they’re white too, so why not blame them all for the economic turmoil that’s occurred under Obama?

    And second, speaking of race, will you please tell me why it’s racist to criticize a black man? Are we supposed to believe that Obama can do no wrong simply because of the color of his skin? Again, how intellectual is that? I know you liberals devoutly believe that yelling “Raaaaaacist!” all the time makes you morally superior people, but it really doesn’t. Instead, it just reveals you to be intellectual light weights who resort to strategic personal attacks to avoid trying to defend your indefensible policies.

  14. Mike says:

    Very good points.

    First, I absolutely agree, Obama is on the hook for everything that happened on account of what he did on his watch, and he has done much I would and do criticize. I would just point out what any economist would– economies don’t change overnight on account of current policies, they are a bit like turning an ocean liner. Also, I don’t blame Bush or anything else for economic cycles, just as they (or a Democrat) shouldn’t get credit when things trend up on their own. Having said all that, I would have to agree that Obama (and Congress) have not exactly acted in the most fiscally responsible manner.

    Second, I NEVER said Obama couldn’t be criticized or can do no wrong, and that to say he can or could would be racist. That’s your spin. Nor did I say all the criticism has been racist motivated. I would be very happy to discuss the pros and cons of Obama’s policies in a race-free atmosphere. He does NOT get a pass because he’s black.

    The reality is that isn’t happening. Sorry. I’ve seen heard too many references, on the air and in print to:
    — Skinny crackheads (Obama)
    — Crack whore (Michelle)
    – Food stamp president (Obama)
    — Jungle bunnies (O Family)
    — “Muslims” (Same)
    –“Kenyan birth certificates” (give me a break)

    etc, etc, etc

    Many of these are just from idiot blogs and websites. Some from the mouths of idiot polticians. Some are straight from Fox News. And NONE are disavowed by the candidates. We are talking about the President and his family. Shameful.

    And yes, some of the personal attacks (like on Santorum, who I think is abominable but I don’t sanction the attacks) from the left are awful. 2 wrongs don’t make a right. And Rick Santorum is not the POTUS.

    What I think is admirable is that Obama, for all his faults, has mostly let all this shit roll off him. He has not gotten defensive nor has he attacked in kind. I have found that very frustrating but I think it’s probably the right approach.

    Ok, now you can come back and tell me about how liberals beat up on poor GW Bush. And you’d be right. But if you look at the attacks, it was mainly along these lines:
    — rich spoiled kid
    -clueless and over his head
    – but basically a nice guy
    You know, the guy we’d all be happy to have a beer with or go duck hunting with. But not necessarily give the keys to the store.


  15. Mike says:


    Oh by the way, let me set the record straight. I did not call Robert “anti-intellectual”. Sorry if anyone took it that way.

    I was just bemoaning the undeniably anti-intellectual tone of much of the rhetoric I see coming from the conservative right. Actually the exchange we’ve been having in the last day or so is suggests to me that Robert (and you) are thoughtful people. We just happen to disagree on some issues but that’s OK. Let’s see if we can all do that without more name-calling, OK?

    And just to get it out of the way (preemptively as it were), I’m not calling you and Robert racists, either. I am just bemoaning the undeniable racist tone that seems to underly criticism of Obama, and which (in my view) just undercuts what might be otherwise legitimate criticism.
    reply from Seane Anna: Mike, I’m glad you think Robert and I are thoughtful people. Trust me, we truly try to be even when our comments get a little overheated. I’m also glad you realize that Obama can make mistakes and that pointing that out isn’t inherently racist. Freedom to criticize our leaders is an essential part of our democracy and it disturbs me that many on the Left are, imo, trying to stifle that freedom by spreading the narrative that it’s racist to criticize Obama. To me, they’re trying to create a climate of repression, which is very anti-democratic. But that’s an argument for another day. I’m getting a bit tired and am calling it a night. Have a good night and a good day tomorrow, Mike.

  16. Mike says:

    Sorry, important word missing from last:

    “I am just bemoaning the undeniable racist tone that seems to underly SOME criticism of Obama, and which (in my view) just undercuts what might be otherwise legitimate criticism.”

    I did NOT mean to say that all criticism of Obama is racist, ok?


  17. Mike says:

    >trying to stifle that freedom by spreading the narrative that it’s racist to criticize Obama. To me, >they’re
    Yes, that’s one perspective, and to the extent it’s true I agree.

    Another is that any criticism (legit or otherwise) will be dismissed by many folks, me included, if it comes with a helping of racism. So conservatives don’t help their cause if they either play into that or tolerate it. The result is that you will wind up convincing no one except those that are already convinced. Not you intend I think. Gee I am giving you helpful advice. I better stop 😉

    Good night.

  18. Mike says:

    Robert and Seanne-Anna-
    It’s been fun but I gotta get back to making triggers for nuclear warheads. I’ll check back with you on Election Weds to see how we did.
    reply from Robert and Seane-Anna: Mike, it’s been fun for me and Seane-Anna, too. We both look forward to talking with you again after the election, which we fervently hope our side wins. Until then, take care.

  19. Mike says:

    Robert and S-A:
    In the big scheme of things, we’re all on the same side, right?
    reply from Robert: Mike, Seane-Anna and I are on the side of what’s best for America. I’m sure you believe you are, too. We just have very different ideas of what that “best” is. We can disagree, though, without being disagreeable. I think all three of us can agree that that’s best for America. Take care, Mike. And come back anytime.

  20. Mike says:

    PS – Safe journeys to both of you until then as well.

    And again, putting it in perspective, we have been through 50-some of these things over the years, in war and peace. Not even cancelled in the middle of the war that tore the country in two. We have had good and bad and in between presidents. In every case except maybe 3 (1804 I think; 1876 and 2000, and opinions differ on the last one I am sure!) the people’s choice won and the loser stepped aside (in all 3 of the ‘disputed’ cases, too). No coups. Pretty doggone remarkable. It’s a real circus in a lot of ways but its OUR circus and I do think it compares very favorably with how things are done around the world.

    reply from Robert: Agreed.

  21. Hazezilla says:

    If George Bush ? The guy you put us in debt to commie china for trillions to get Soddoma Bin Laden in Iraistan and later screw the first responders ? I love this mindless one sided bullshit ! =)
    You didn’t get mad when the Supreme Court stopped a legal recount and appointed a President. 
… You didn’t get mad when Cheney allowed Energy company officials to dictate Energy policy and push us to invade Iraq. 
You didn’t get mad when a covert CIA operative got outed. 
You didn’t get mad when the Patriot Act got passed. 
You didn’t get mad when we illegally invaded a country that posed no threat to us.
You didn’t get mad when we spent over 800 billion (and counting) on said illegal war. 
You didn’t get mad when Bush borrowed more money from foreign sources than the previous 42 Presidents combined. 
You didn’t get mad when over 10 billion dollars in cash just disappeared in Iraq. 
You didn’t get mad when you found out we were torturing people. 
You didn’t get mad when Bush embraced trade and outsourcing policies that shipped 6 million American jobs out of the country. 
You didn’t get mad when the government was illegally wiretapping Americans. 
You didn’t get mad when we didn’t catch Bin Laden. 
You didn’t get mad when Bush rang up 10 trillion dollars in combined budget and current account deficits. 
You didn’t get mad when you saw the horrible conditions at Walter Reed. 
You didn’t get mad when we let a major US city, New Orleans, drown. 
You didn’t get mad when we gave people who had more money than they could spend, the filthy rich, over a trillion dollars in tax breaks. 
You didn’t get mad with the worst 8 years of job creations in several decades. 
You didn’t get mad when over 200,000 US Citizens lost their lives because they had no health insurance. 
You didn’t get mad when lack of oversight and regulations from the Bush Administration caused US Citizens to lose 12 trillion dollars in investments, retirement, and home values. 

You finally got mad when a black man was elected President and decided that people in America deserved the right to see a doctor if they are sick. 
Yes, illegal wars, lies, corruption, torture, job losses by the millions, stealing your tax dollars to make the rich richer, and the worst economic disaster since 1929 are all okay with you, but helping fellow Americans who are sick…Oh, Hell No!! 

    You’re all really ignorant , limited , fear fed common as shit white trash. i know because I grew up and live in a mostly conservative community. Your denial is beneath us all and total batshit.
    reply from Robert: The really ignorant one is you. Limited with your fear that America will continue to be great and help the world when needed, something that your Obama is doing everything he can to destroy.

    You talk of the trillions that Bush caused, but, the national debt was half what it is now, when he left office, and Obama has spent more in his three years than every president before him combined has spent. You wanna talk about someone who is working to destroy this nation? It wasn’t Bush. Now, I admit that there were things he did that were wrong. The first bailouts. That was wrong. That is not the government’s job….but Bush made it the government’s job. All you spouted here was nothing but baloney that if not stopped in the bud, would destroy this nation, the way the liberals and obama have been working to do the last three years, and the liberals for the last century. And you libs just cannot handle someone standing up to your ideals and showing backbone in letting you know you are wrong.

    Sonny, socialism, which you seem to espouse, has never ever worked in this world. Find me a time when it worked. It will seem to work for a while but sooner or later, you will run out of other peoples’ money. And that is what we have done here. America is broke. Our generation is broke. Our children’s generation is broke. Even the next generations that aren’t even here yet are broke because of the spending that the government is doing. Get your brain in gear and find out that you are wrong. Stop being a puppet for the liberal machine that is destroying this nation.

  22. pat says:

    how do I get the card????
    reply from Robert: I wish I knew. It was on the article that I found the story on. I copied and pasted it. I too thought it was great.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s