This Mayor has the right idea folks……

Running around the internet yesterday, I came across a site called: Small town defenders where a Mayor from the town of Hazleton, Pennsylvania has started what I hope is a movement that will sweep the nation. He has drafted the Illegal Immigration Relief Act noting that if nothing was done, that his town would flounder and fail. Here is what he said:

I’m Lou Barletta, the proud Mayor of the City of Hazleton, Pennsylvania.


I believe the United States of America is the greatest nation on Earth. People who are in this country have an incredible amount of opportunities and blessings.

But some people have taken advantage of America’s openness and tolerance. Some come to this country and refuse to learn English, creating a language barrier for city employees. Others enter the country illegally and use government services by not paying taxes or by committing crime on our streets, further draining resources here in Hazleton.

Recent crimes – such as a high-profile murder, the discharge of a gun at a crowded city playground, and drug busts – have involved illegal immigrants. Some of those allegedly involved in those crimes were detained by other law enforcement officials over the years, but were somehow allowed to remain in this country. They eventually migrated into Hazleton, where they helped create a sense of fear in the good, hardworking residents who are here legally.

Illegal aliens in our City create an economic burden that threatens our quality of life.

With a growing problem and a limited budget, I could not sit back any longer and allow this to happen. I needed to act!

That’s why I drafted the Illegal Immigration Relief Act, a measure designed to say enough is enough.

To the residents of Hazleton, I say thank you for your support. To our recently arrived legal immigrants, I say welcome to our City. I wish you all the best and hope the United States and Hazleton can be a place where your dreams come true. I am proud to represent you as your Mayor.

And to illegal immigrants and those who would hire or abet them in any way, I say your time is up. You are no longer welcome.

There are thousands of small towns and cities across America like Hazleton, Pennsylvania.

I hope the steps we’re taking in Hazleton to defend ourselves will inspire others to become small town defenders.

Thank you for visiting Small Town Defenders! Be sure to visit our online petition page and let us know how you feel.

Now this IS A WORTHWHILE effort people. We are NOT being mean by doing this. By all means we are NOT. We are just trying to follow the laws that this country has in place for people who come here Illegally. All this politically correct crap is leading this country down the shitter, and we are allowing this to happen. As Harry Truman said….“The Buck Stops Here!!!” And before this country is destroyed, the way the liberals have destroyed our standing in the world, we need to make a stand and stop this lunacy that has been going on about the immigration problem.

Sure, the world has changed, but if we allow the laws to change everytime they are a little difficult to enforce, or it hurts the feelings of some people, then our laws will become fodder that will only be good for manure. Nothing else. Do you really want that? I know I don’t. A lawless land is the last step to anarchy…..and we are already knocking at that door.

Also, it was brought up to me, that Georgia is doing the same sort of thing and it is making the illegals liquidate their stuff and moving on to more friendly states, or back to mexico. Here is a video from youtube about it.

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops
God Bless my Readers


Something interesting….Who said this?

I found this thing a few days ago that I finally read, and it is an interesting comparison to Karl Marx and Hillary Clinton. And to tell the truth, it is scary too. You really want this woman for your next president????


Who Said it? Hillary Clinton? or Karl Marx…..The answers follow the quotes.

1. “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”
Hillary Clinton (06/29/04)

2. “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”
Karl Marx(1875)

3. “It’s time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few and for the few,… and to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity.”
Hillary Clinton (05/29/07)

4.“[T]he gap between theose who are enjoying the fruits of the modern economy and those who aren’t is growing wider.”
Hillary Clinton(05/29/07)

5. [T]he most advanced countries [have]…a heavy progressive or graduated income tax.”
Karl Marx (1848)

6. “If [politicians] propose proportional taxes … workers must demand progressive taxes.”
Karl Marx (1850)

7. “I believe we need a new progressive vision….I believe we can help more workers join unions to improve wages and conditions in our work places.”
Hillary Clinton (05/29/07)

8. “The real fruit of [working people’s] battles lies … in the ever-expanding union of the workers.”
Karl Marx (1848)

9. “If your a full-time worker, you should make more than poverty.”
Hillary Clinton (05/29/07)

10. “[W]orkers must, at every opportunity, put forward their own demands alongside of the demands of business.”
Karl Marx (1850)

11. [W]e can’t…just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people.”
Hillary Clinton (06/04/07)

12. “If you’re a worker who can’t organize for fair wages and safe working conditions, you’re invisible.”
Hillary Clinton(05/29/07)

13. “So far as I am concerned, I will continue my work and constantly strive to strengthen among all workers this solidarity that is so fruitful for the future.”
Karl Marx (1872)

14. “I think it’s time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in [the] entire economy that they’re being watched.”
Hillary Clinton (09/02/05)

15. “We have to build a political consesus. And that requires people to give up a little bit of their own turf in order to create this common ground.”
Hillary Clinton (06/04/07)

16. “Do not say that social movement excludes political movement. There is never a political movment that is not at the same time social.”
Karl Marx (1847)

17. I’m not a Marxist!”
Karl Marx (1883)

18. “I certainly think the free market has failed.
Hillary Clinton (06/06/07)

19. “Anyone who knows anything of history knows that great socail changes are impossible without feminine upheaval.”
Karl Marx (1868) On that one I think I stumped a bunch of you…..

20. “The phiosohers have only interpreted the world in vaious was’ they point, however, is to change it.”
Karl Marx (1845)

21. “[Y]ou need a government regulatory system…to keep an eye on people to make the rules of the game fair.”
Hillary Clinton (09/02/05)

22. “The rich will do anything for the poor but get off their backs.”
Karl Marx (undated)

23. “…I’m obviously not talking just about or even primarily about geograph[y] … but about the network of relationships and values that do connect us and bind us together.”
Hillary Clinton (1996)

24. “Society does not consist of individuals but expresses the sum of interrelations, the relations within which these individuals stand.”
Karl Marx (1858)

25. “We are at a stage in history in which remolding society is one of the great challenges facing all of us in the West.”
Hillary Clinton (04/06/93)

I have to ask the people who are thinking of voting for Ms. Hillary Clinton for president. Do you really want her for president? I know that I don’t. She is a socialistic commie…there are no other words for her.

I know that there were a lot of those quote above that surprised many of you by who said it. I know it did me. But it goes to show just where Hillary Clinton’s mind is. And it isn’t in a place that is for the betterment of America.

I have nothing against having a woman for president. As a matter of fact, I think it would be a refreshing change, but there has to be another woman. The only thing that Hillary is interested in is the same thing that Nancy Palosi was interested in. And that was and is, being the first woman in the office. As for me, I want a woman in there that wants to be there for the good of the country. Not because she would be the first. And I definitely do not want a socialist liberal in there…….

Now, give me a woman that wants to be there to help this country back to it’s greatness, and do the right things for America, and someone who can see the “big picture” and I think she would make a great president. But that person is NOT Hillary Clinton.

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops
God Bless my Readers


Until Then,……You worry me…..and why!

I was wandering around the internet today, and actually ran across something that really tells it like it is about a big problem we have here in the states.

The pilot who wrote this was dead-on right with what he had to say about Muslims.

It seems the only thing we ever hear anymore from a Liberal, or their press, is how America is wrong and everyone else is right.

Well, I am here to say that America is NOT wrong, but the direction we are heading is. We are too worried about what others think, and don’t worry enough about what is good for us.

The newspaper today stated, that some Muslim doctor is saying we are profiling him because he has been stopped to be checked three times while getting on an airplane. My words to that are…..
Inconvenient? YES! Necessary? Without a doubt! Profiling? NO!!! Here is what Captain John Maniscalco, an American Arilines pilot said in an open letter:

“You Worry Me!”

by American Airlines Pilot — Captain John Maniscalco

I have been trying to say this since 9-11, but you worry me. I wish you didn’t. I wish when I walk down the streets of the country that I love, that your color and culture still blended with the beautiful human landscape we enjoy in this country.
But you don’t blend in anymore. I notice you, and it worries me. I notice you because I can’t help it anymore. People from your homelands, professing to be Muslims, have been attacking and killing my fellow citizens and our friends for more than 20 years now. I don’t fully understand their grievances and hate, but I know nothing can justify the inhumanity of their attacks.
On September 11th, nineteen ARAB-MUSLIMS hijacked four jetliners in my country. They cut the throats of women in front of children and brutally stabbed to death others. They took control of those planes and crashed them into buildings killing thousands of proud fathers, loving sons, wise grandparents, elegant daughters, best friends, favorite coaches, fearless public servants, and children’s mothers.
The Palestinians Celebrated, the Iraqis were overjoyed as was most of the Arab world. So, I notice you now. I don’t want to be worried. I don’t want to be consumed by the same rage and hate and prejudice that have destroyed the souls of these terrorists. But, I need your help. As a rational American, trying to protect my country and family in an irrational and unsafe world, I must know how to tell the difference between you, and the Arab/Muslim terrorist.
How do I differentiate between the true Arab/Muslim Americans, and the Arab/Muslim Terrorists in our communities who are attending our schools, enjoying our parks, and living in OUR communities under the protection of OUR constitution, while they plot the next attack that will slaughter these same good neighbors and children?
The events of September 11th changed the answer. It is NOT my responsiibility to determine which of you embraces our great country, with all of its religions, with ALL of it’s different citizens, with all of its faults. It is time for every Arab/Muslim in this country to determine it for me.
I want to know, I demand to know, and I have a right to know, whether or not you love America? Do you pledge allegiance to the flag? Do you proudly display it in front of your house, or on your car? Do you pray in your many daily prayers that Allah will bless this nation, the He will protect and prosper it? Or do you pray that Allah will destroy it in one of your Jihads? Are you thankful for the freedom that only this nation affords? A freedom that was paid for by the blood of hundreds of thousands of patriots who gave their lives for this country? Are you willing to preserve this freedom by also paying the ultimate sacrifice? Do you love America?
Vintage Postcards from
American Flag from

If this is your commitment, then I need YOU to start letting ME know about it. Your Muslim leaders in this nation should be flooding the media at this time with hard facts on your faith, and what hard actions you are taking as a community and as a religion to protect the United States of America.
Please, no more benign overtures of regret for the death of the innocent because I worry about who you regard as innocent. No more benign overtures of condemnation for the unprovoked attacks because I worry about what is unprovoked to you. I am not interested in any more sympathy. I am only interested in action.
What will you do for America – our great country – at this time of crisis, at this time of war?
I want to see Arab-Muslims waving the AMERICAN flag in the streets. I want to hear you chanting “Allah Bless America”. I want to see young Arab/Muslim men enlisting in the military. I want to see a commitment of money, time, and emotion to the victims of this butchering and to this nation as a whole.
The FBI has a list of over 400 people they want to talk to regarding the WTC attack. Many of these people live and socialize right now in Muslim communities. You know them. You know where they are. Hand them over to us now! But I have seen little even approaching this sort of action. Instead I have seen an already closed and secretive community close even tighter. You have disappeared from the streets. You have posted armed security guards at your facilities. You have threatened lawsuits. You have screamed for protection from reprisals. The very few Arab/Muslim representatives that HAVE appeared in the media were defensive and equivocating.
They seemed more concerned with making sure that the United States proves who was responsible before taking action. They seemed more concerned with protecting their fellow Muslims from violence directed towards them in the United States and abroad than they did with supporting our country and denouncing “leaders” like Khadafi, Hussein, Farrakhan, and Arafat.
If the true teachings of Islam proclaim tolerance and peace and love for all people, then I want chapter and verse from the Koran and statements from popular Muslim leaders to back it up. What good is it if the teachings in the Koran are good , and pure, and true, when your “leaders” are teaching fanatical interpretations, terrorism, and intolerance?
It matters little how good Islam SHOULD BE, if huge numbers of the world’s Muslims interpret the teachings of Mohammed incorrectly and adhere to a degenerative form of the religion. A form that has been demonstrated to us over and over again. A form whose members are recruited from the prisons around the world. A form whose members (some as young as five years old) are seen day after day, week in and week out, year after year, marching in the streets around the world, burning effigies of our presidents, burning the American flag, shooting weapons into the air. A form whose members convert from a peaceful religion, only to take up arms against the great United States of America, the country of their birth. A form whose rules are so twisted, that their travelling members refuse to show their faces at airport security checkpoints, in the name of Islam.
We will NEVER allow the attacks of September 11, or any others for that matter, to take away that which is so precious to us: Our rights under the greatest Constitution in the world.
I want to know where every Arab Muslim in this country stands and I think it is my right and the right of every true citizen of this country to demand it. A right paid for by the blood of thousands of my brothers and sisters who died protecting the very constitution that is protecting you and your family. I am pleading with you to let me know.
I want you here as my brother, my neighbor, my friend, as a fellow American.
But there can be no gray areas or ambivalence regarding your allegiance and it is up to YOU to show ME where YOU stand. Until then. “YOU WORRY ME!”

AMEN to that people! This man has it right. It isn’t up to us to find out this information. We are in our own country. We are NOT the ones who need to do the work here. They are. They came here, do they have a commitment to America or to Islam? Do they have a committment to peace, or to a Jihad? They need to speak up and let us know, because until they do, they will be profiled, and they should be. After all, just as Captain Maniscalco said…..”On September 11th, nineteen ARAB/MUSLIMS hijacked four jetliners in my country. They cut the throats of women in front of children and brutally stabbed to death others. They took control of those planes and crashed them into buildings killing thousands of proud fathers, loving sons, wise grandparents, elegant daughters, best friends, favorite coaches, fearless public servants, and children’s mothers. They killed Americans……and we should want to know where their allegiances lie…….with us…..or with them.

It is time for the Muslims to stop being defensive and start letting us know because we have that right. WE HAVE THAT RIGHT!!! The safety of our great country depends on it.

God Bless America, and Allah Bless America too…..
God Bless our troops
God Bless my readers


This letter was checked out by me at for validity, and it shows it as non conclusive though, an American Airlines pilot by the name of Captain John Maniscalco does exist.

Here is how to Solve the Immigration problems we have….

I believe as Newt Gingrich does, that solving the border problems we have is easy and can be done with a minimum of violence and a minimum of effort. All we have to do, is to become the country that fought World War II. Like he said, when we fought that war, we liberated many countries, including Germany, and Africa and the whole of the Pacific area….and we did it in less time that has passed since 9/11/2001! And why? It was because we were serious about it. Something that for all points and purposes, we are not today.

But, he said it much much better than I ever could, so this whole post is put here for this video. Newt Gingrich talking about Immigration and the Borders.

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops
God Bless my Readers


Fire and Ice – Journalist’s obsession with disasters to mankind and climate….

I have been watching this whole Global Warming fiasco from the so called scientists who claim it is and then isn’t happening, to Al Gore and his stupid documentary on Global Warming and I have to say this…..Can’t you get it through your heads that this climate change that we are going through is cyclical and happens over and over and has happened over and over since the beginning of time?

In a new summary called Fire and Ice it concludes that journalists have warned of climate change for 100 years, but can’t decide whether we face an ice age or warming. I have seen this ineptitude in my lifetime, remembering back to the 1970’s when they were predicting that life was going to end as we know it, because the glaciers were advancing and the earth was cooling at an alarming rate. Now Al Gore and the global warming crowd is claiming that we are going to die in 30 years if we don’t do something about the way we are living, because the earth is warming at an alarming rate. Reading through the Special Report called Fire and Ice, I read the article that showed how the media has handled this global warming, global cooling over the last 100 years. This is amazing that they can’t remember what they said a few short years ago…..kind of like politics. They don’t seem to remember what they said a short while ago. Here are some good examples: (Accents of Bold, underlines, and italics are mine to accent important parts)

It was five years before the turn of the century and major media were warning of disastrous climate change. Page six of the New York Times was headlined with the serious concerns of “geologists.” Only the president at the time wasn’t Bill Clinton; it was Grover Cleveland. And the Times wasn’t warning about global warming — it was telling readers the looming dangers of a new ice age……..

The Media Research Center’s Business and Media Institute (formerly the Free Market Project) conducted an extensive analysis of print media’s climate change coverage back to the late 1800’s.
It found that many publications now claiming the world is on the brink of a global warming disaster said the same about an impending ice age — just 30 years ago. Several major ones, including the New York Times well, Surprise SURPRISE SURPRISE!!!!, Time magazine, and Newsweek, have reported on three or even four different climate shifts since 1895.

In addition, BMI found:

“Global Cooling” Was just as Realistic: Several publications warned in the 1970’s that global cooling posed a major threat to the food supply. Now, remarkably, global warming is also considered a threat to the very same food supply.

Glaciers Are Growing or Shrinking: The media continue to point to glaciers as a sign of climate change, but they have used them as examples of both cooling and warming.

Global Warming History Ignored: The media treats global warming like it’s a new idea. In fact, British amateur meteorologist G. S. Callendar argued that mankind was responsible for heating up the planet with carbon dioxide emissions — in 1938. That was decades before scientists and journalists alerted the public about the threat of a new ice age.

New York Times the Worst: Longtime readers of the Times could easily recall the paper claiming “A Major Cooling Widely Considered to be Inevitable,” along with it’s strong support of global warming predictions. Older readers might well recall two other claims of a climate shift back to the 1800s — one an ice age, and the other warming again.

The Times has warned of four separate climate changes since 1895.

Now for all you out there, here is more on that report, and the ever changing stance of the media, blowing hot or cold, with short-term changes in temperatures. You decide for yourselves whether the media is spinning a tale to get desired results or telling the truth. I think, that the truth is something they haven’t known about for a century.

Following the ice age threats from the late 1800’s fears of an imminent and icy catastrophe were compounded in the 1920’s by Arctic explorer Donald MacMillan and an obsession with the news of his polar expedition. As the Times put it on Feb 24, 1895, “Geologists Think the World May Be Frozen Up Again.”
Those concerns lasted well into the late 1920’s. But when the earth’s surface warmed less than half a degree, newspapers and magazines responded with stories about the new threat. Once again the Times was out in front, cautioning “the earth is steadily growing warmer.”
After a while, that second phase of climate cautions began to fade. By 1954, Fortune magazine was warming to another cooling trend and ran an article titled “Climate — the Heat May Be Off.” As the United States and the old Soviet Union faced off, the media joined them with reports of a more dangerous Cold War of Man vs. Nature.
The New York Times ran warming stories into the late 1950’s, but it too came around to the new fears. Just three decades ago, in 1975, the paper reported: “A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable.”

That trend, too, cooled off and was replaced by the current era of reporting on the dangers of global warming. Just six years later, on August 22, 1981, the Times quoted seven government atmospheric scientists who predicted global warming of an “almost unprecedented magnitude.”
In all, the print news media have warned of four separate climate changes in slightly more than 100 years — global cooling, warming, cooling again, and, perhaps not so finally, warming. Some current warming stories combine the concepts and claim the next ice age will be triggered by rising temperatures — the theme of the 2004 movie “The Day After Tomorrow.”

Now if that isn’t enough people, do we have to continually go over this rhetoric over and over and over again? If people and the press would just remember what was said before, we could prevent this stupidity from continuing. But the press continues it. I know that if this Global Warming scare tactic that they and Al Gore is on now doesn’t work, that in a few years we can expect them to head back to everyone dying because of Global Cooling. Same story, different line. Trouble is, they use the “different lines” over and over and over again to ad nauseum. The report goes on to say:

Despite all the historical shifting from one position to another, many in the media no longer welcome opposing views on the climate. CBS reporter Scott Pelley went so far as to compare climate change skeptics with Holocaust deniers.
“If I do an interview with [Holocaust survivor] Elie Wiesel,” Pelley asked, “am I required as a journalist to find a Holocaust denier?” he said in an interview on March 23 with CBS News’s PublicEye Blog.
He added that the whole idea of impartial journalism just didn’t work for climate stories. “There becomes a point in journalism where striving for balance becomes irresponsible,” he said.
Pelley’s comments ignored an essential point: that 30 years ago, the media were certain about the prospect of a new ice age. And that is only the most recent example of how much journalists have changed their minds on this essential debate.
Some in the media would probably argue that they merely report what scientists tell them, but that would only be half true.
Journalists decide not only what they cover; they also decide whether to include opposing viewpoints. That’s a balance lacking in current “debate.”
This isn’t a question of science. it’s a question of whether Americans can trust what the media tells them about science.


The ice age is coming, the sun’s
zooming in
Engines stop running, the wheat
is growing thin
A nuclear era, but I have no fear
‘Cause London is drowning, and I
live by the river.

–The Clash
“London Calling,”

The first Earth Day was celebrated on April 22, 1970, amidst hysteria about the dangers of a new ice age. The media had been spreading warning of a cooling period since the 1950’s, but those alarms grew louder in the 1970’s.
Three months before, on January 11, The Washington Post told readers to “get a good grip on your long johns, cold weather haters — the worst may be yet to come,” in an article titled “Colder Winters Held Dawn of New Ice Age.” The article quoted climatologist Reid Bryson, who said “there’s no relilef in sight’ about the cooling trend.
Journalists took the threat of another ice age seriously. Fortune magazine actually won a “Science Writing Award” from the American Institute of Physics for its own analysis of the danger. “As for the present cooling trend a number of leading climatologists have concluded that it is very bad news indeed,” Fortune announced in February 1974.
“It is the root cause of a lot of that unpleasant weather around the world and they warn that it carries the potential for human disasters of unprecedented magnitude,” the article continued.
That article also emphasized Bryson’s extreme doomsday predictions. “There is very important climatic change going on right now, and it’s not merely something of academic interest.”

Bryson warned, “It is something that, if it continues, will affect the whole human occupation of the earth — like a billion people starving. The effects are already showing up in a rather drastic way.” However, the world population increased by 2.5 billion since that warning. Kind of sounds like the crap they are trying to hand us now doesn’t it? If we don’t change our ways we will die and there are already effects showing up in a rather drastic way……sheesh. What poppycock!
Fortune had been emphasizing the cooling trend for 20 years. In 1954, it picked up on the idea of a frozen earth and ran an article titled “Climate — the Heat May Be Off.”
The story debunked the notion that “despite all you may have read, heard, or imagined, it’s been growing cooler — not warmer — since the Thirties.”
The claims of global catastrophe were remarkably similar to what the media delivers now about global warming. Probably people, because it is the same as then. Just a different time, and a different spin (or temperature if you will.)
“The cooling has already killed hundreds of thousands of people in poor nations,” wrote Lowell Ponte in his 1976 book “The Cooling.”
If the proper measures weren’t taken, he cautioned, then the cooling would lead to “world famine, world chaos, and probably world war, and this could all come by the year 2000.”

This is bullshit people. On November 15, 1969, in the Science News, they quoted a meteorologist by the name of Dr. J. Murray Mitchell Jr., about global cooling worries. They quoted him as saying “how long the current cooling trend continues is one of the most important problems of our civilization,” and he continued saying that if the cooling continued for 200 to 300 years, the earth could be plunged into an ice age. Six years later, the periodical reported ‘that the cooling since 1940 has been large enough and consistent enough that it will not soon be reversed.’ And because of all the hype, the world bought this hook line and sinker and the idea of a world encased in a snowball flourished and grew…….just like Al Gore’s crap that he is spewing now.

Granted, it is good to not pollute indiscriminately, and be careless with our atmosphere, but come on people lets get real. God created this world knowing what we would do in the future and don’t you think that He would have put something in place that would keep the world livable in the likely event that mankind did things to hurt the environment?

People, life is adaptable. It has been adapting for eons now and will continue to adapt till the end of time, which isn’t by the way in our hands. It is in God’s hands and only His. Keep that in mind and you can say to the Al Gore’s of the world….”Shut your pie hole and live life as God intended….don’t worry……be happy.

God Bless America and our Troops
God Bless My Readers


To find out more information or to set up an interview, contact Colleen O’Boyle at 703-683-5004 ext. 122
Taken from the Business and Media Institute’s Executive Summary of Fire and Ice
325 South Patrick St.
Alexandria, VA 22314
(703) 683-9733

How to Destroy America…….

Now do not think that I am advocating destroying America, because I am not, but I found this speech, given by Dick Lamm former Governor of Colorado given at an Immigration-Overpopulation Conference in Washington D.C., and I had to study on this a bit. I went to and checked out it’s validity and found that this is true. And people, being true, it is very scary, because Common sense should tell you that what he said is true….read on:

We know Dick Lamm as the former Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are particularly poignant. There was an immigration overpopulation conference in Washington, DC, filled to capacity by many of America’s finest minds and leaders. A brilliant college professor by the name of Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest book, “Mexifornia,” explaining how immigration – both legal and illegal was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.
Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America. The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States He said, “If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let’s destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that ‘An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.’
“Here is how it happens,” Lamm said: “First, to destroy America, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country.” History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way: “The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy.” Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficult times with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans.”
Lamm went on: Second, to destroy America, “Invent ‘multiculturalism’ and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. Make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. Make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.
Third, “We could make the United States an ‘Hispanic Quebec’ without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: “The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentricity and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.” Lamm said, “I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture.. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities.”
“Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school.”
“My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of ‘Victimology.’ I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population.”
“My sixth plan for America’s downfall would include dual citizenship, and pro mote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other- that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common Language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic games. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty.. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell. “E. Pluribus Unum” — from many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the ‘Pluribus’ instead of the ‘Unum,’ we will balkanize America as surely as Kosovo.”
“Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits; make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of ‘diversity.’ I would find a word similar to ‘heretic’ in the 16th century – that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like ‘racist’ or ‘xenophobe’ halt discussion and debate. Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multiculturalism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of ‘victimology,’ I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them.”
In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he said, “Lastly, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis’s book “Mexifornia.” His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don’t read that book.”

Now if this doesn’t scare you people into action, then I guess America is bound for it’s own suicide.

In this speech are at least seven ways listed to destroy America, and people, we are letting all of them happen!

It is like he said, multiculturalism is not bad to have, but it is bad for a society. Why do you think that the countries that seem to be going good now are not doing that? Have you ever wondered why we are having so many problems now? I have been ranting about the war, and immigration…those are not the only reasons we are having troubles. Immigration is a biggie, but it is not the only reason. We are turning ourselves into a bilingual nation, forsaking the fact that English has been our language for centuries, and letting in the Mexican language and culture in is part of the suicide. It is like the former governor said…..multiculturalism in a society causes tension and distrust. We need to stop this, and assert ourselves as Americans and stop trying to be politically correct in everything. Let everyone know that when they come here, they have to do it legally, they have to learn the English language and embrace our laws and culture.

So, the question is clear here people. Do we want to commit suicide as a nation, or do we want to stay a nation that is revered and coveted around the world? The answer is simple, if we want to stay a nation. And that is to stop catering to the whims of illegals, and other nations. Start worrying about our own society and culture. …. . … . cause it is quickly becoming something of the past if we don’t stop what we are doing. And what we are doing is Committing Suicide as a nation.

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops
God Bless my Readers


Senator Coleman Shows he has moxie against the Liberal Machine…..

I was wandering around this morning and came upon Ladies Logic and read this wonderful post about the Senior Senator from Minnesota having the guts enough to stand up to Senator Durbin on this Fairness Doctrine that the Democrats suddenly want to ressurect from the 70’s, when they tried it then.

The Fairness Doctrine is nothing more than the liberals attempt to do what they couldn’t do when they founded Air America their version of Talk Radio, that has done so well for the Conservatives, but not them. Since Air America failed, they have been trying to find a way to break into the airwaves to get their words across, seemingly forgetting that they have the airwaves all but locked up with their views on CBS, NBC and ABC, and for the most part CNN, where the only dissenting voice on any of those is Glenn Beck. How he managed to get on CNN is actually beyond me. But I am glad he did.

Here is what Ladies Logic posted: (at

Sen. Coleman BLASTS Sen. Durbin on the floor
Friday, July 13, 2007 2:42 PM

Senator Norm Coleman has done much, in the last two days, to give conservatives a reason to cheer. In a dust up between Senator Coleman and Senator Durbin of IL, Senator Coleman had this to say about the “Fairness” Doctrin. (H/T AAA via Capt. Ed)

“The government does not — does not — have the responsibility to regulate content of speech. That’s what the first amendment is about. It’s exactly what the first amendment is about. Government’s not supposed to be regulating content. And in a time in 1949 when you had three network TV stations, basically, when had you limited channels of communication, I presume there was a legitimate concern on the part of some that, in fact, government needs to step in and ensure balance. But now we’re in 2007. We’re at a time where we’ve got 20,000, you know, opportunities for stations and satellite, where you have cable, you have blogs, you have a whole range of information. I think it would be — I — I can’t even conceive — I can’t even conceive that the market could not provide opportunities for differing positions because it does. And in the end — in the end, consumers also have a right based on the market to make choices. And so if they make choices that say we want to hear more of one side than the other, that’s ok okay. And I think it’s very dangerous, I say to my — my friend from Illinois, I think it’s very dangerous for government to be in the position of deciding what’s fair and balanced. Because as we see on the floor of the senate, oftentimes amongst ourselves, learned — hopefully learned individuals who’ve the great humble opportunity to serve in the US Senate, we have differences as to what is fair and balanced. And so the reason I think we have a First Amendment is that we get government out of — out of the — the measuring, controlling, dictating, regulating content and that’s my concern. …
John Kennedy stated, “we are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.” Mr. President, I’m not afraid of of — of the people. I’m not afraid of the people having access to the in information, ideas that they want to have access to. But I am afraid of the government stepping in and regulating content. We have a first amendment. That’s the underpinning, the foundation of all the other amendments. The fairness doctrine flies in the face of that. It was rejected. It was rejected in 1987. The idea of bringing it back today is a very, very bad idea. This amendment specifically includes the Armed forces network. Our folks are out there on the front line fighting. They should be able to tune into whatever they want to tune into and they shouldn’t be thinking that back home someone at the FCC is listening and monitoring and deciding what is fair and what is balanced. Let the people decide. Let the market decide. Let the first amendment flourish.
Mr. President, with that, I yield the floor.” (emphasis mine)

I’ll look for audio/video later, but in the meantime I have to say “Salut” to Minnesota’s senior Senator. Well done!

First off, I have to say she is right here. Salute! to the senior Senator of Minnesota. Senator Durbin, one of those liberals that opens his mouth without thought about what is coming out of it never has anyone ever seem to say “hey Durbin your wrong here” finally has. And I am proud to say that Senator Norm Coleman is the one who did it. I add my Salute to you Senator, and also add a BRAVO too. The rest of you whimpy Republicans out there can learn from this and stand up too. Whether or not you think you have them… do have a backbone. Start using it.

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops
God Bless my Readers


I told you that they wouldn’t listen to us…..

I said it when the people spoke, and said that we shouldn’t make the illegals legal, and we have also shown our displeasure about what the government is doing when it comes to the war on terror.

Well, they are at it again! They have found out that we as the people, do NOT agree with them on the immigration problem that they came up with that stupid law for, and we told them to stop. Well…….here is what they have done.

They have changed their ideas now, and are going for the other thing that they KNOW we are against. The house today OKed a plan to withdraw US troops. Now they know, there is a contingent of the United States citizenry that is for that very thing…but they also know there are many many who feel we need to get in there, and fight like our lives depended on it..and stop with this armchair generalling the government is doing. They need to fund the war and let the troops do what they are there to do, and that is to finish this war, and then come home. But NO…..they can’t do that. Here is the story I found on Yahoo tonight, from Associated Press…..

House OKs plan to withdraw US troops

By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent 1 hour, 14 minutes ago

The Iraqi government is achieving only spotty military and political progress, the Bush administration conceded Thursday in an assessment that war critics quickly seized on as confirmation of their dire warnings. Within hours, the House voted to withdraw U.S. troops by spring.
The House measure passed 223-201 in the Democratic-controlled chamber despite a veto threat from President Bush, who has ruled out any change in war policy before September.
“The security situation in Iraq remains complex and extremely challenging,” the administration report concluded. The economic picture is uneven, it added, and the government has not yet enacted vital political reconciliation legislation.
As many as 80 suicide bombers per month cross into the country from Syria, said the interim assessment, which is to be followed by a fuller accounting in September from Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. military commander in the region.
“I believe we can succeed in Iraq, and I know we must,” Bush said at a White House news conference at which he stressed the interim nature of the report.
Describing a document produced by his administration at Congress’ insistence, he said there was satisfactory progress by the Iraqi government toward meeting eight of 18 so-called benchmarks, unsatisfactory progress on eight more and mixed results on the rest.
To his critics — including an increasing number of Republicans — he said bluntly, “I don’t think Congress ought to be running the war. I think they ought to be funding the troops.”
Democrats saw it differently.

A few hours after Bush’s remarks, Democratic leaders engineered passage of legislation requiring the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops to begin within 120 days, and to be completed by April 1, 2008. The measure envisions a limited residual force to train Iraqis, protect U.S. assets and fight al-Qaida and other terrorists.
The vote generally followed party lines: 219 Democrats and four Republicans in favor, and 191 Republicans and 10 Democrats opposed.
Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, R-Mo., voted for troop withdrawals for the first time, contending that while she still opposes a swift pullout, “staying in Iraq indefinitely is equally unacceptable.”
“The report makes clear that not even the White House can conclude there has been significant progress,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.
To Bush and others who seek more time for the administration’s policy to work, she said, “We have already waited too long.”
Republicans sided with Bush — at least for now. The bill “undermines Gen. Petraeus, undermines the mission he has to make America and Iraq safe,” said the House GOP leader, Rep. John Boehner of Ohio. “What we have here is not leadership, it’s negligence.”
The 25-page administration report was issued in the fifth year of a war that has claimed the lives of more than 3,600 U.S. troops and is costing U.S. taxpayers an estimated $10 billion a month.
Bush announced last winter he was ordering thousands of additional troops to the war zone, but the full complement has only arrived in recent weeks. “The full surge in this respect has only just begun,” the report said.
It warned of “tough fighting” during the summer as U.S. and Iraqi forces “seek to seize the initiative from early gains and shape conditions of longer-term stabilization.”
The president sampled the report at his nationally televised session with reporters.
“Iraqis have provided the three brigades they promised for operations in and around Baghdad. And the Iraqi government is spending nearly $7.3 billion from its own funds this year to train, equip and modernize its forces,” he said.
But in other areas, he added, they “have much more work to do. For example, they’ve not done enough to prepare for local elections or pass a law to share oil revenues.”
The report was blunt at points and more opaque at others.
While Iraq has begun to show progress in providing services, “citizens nationwide complain about government corruption and the lack of essential services, such as electricity, fuel supply, sewer, water, health and sanitation.”
At another point, it added, “The prerequisites for a successful militia disarmament program are not present.”
In addition to citing a Syrian connection for terrorists, it also said Iran has continued to foster instability in Iraq.
It cited measured progress on the economic front. “Unemployment has eased slightly and inflation is currently abating,” the report said. It omitted mention of a June 1 Pentagon report estimating an annual inflation rate at 33 percent and the Iraqi government estimate of joblessness at 17 percent.
In an evident jab at critics of Bush’s war policies, the report also said progress toward political reconciliation was hampered by “increasing concern among Iraqi political leaders that the United States may not have a long term-commitment to Iraq.”
Despite rising pressure from Republicans in Congress for a change in course, Bush was adamant.
“When we start drawing down our forces in Iraq, it will (be) because our military commanders say the conditions on the ground are right, not because pollsters say it’ll be good politics,” he said.
Before Thursday’s House vote, GOP aides said they hoped to suffer only a few party defections, but the administration faced a more volatile situation in the Senate. There, three Republicans have already said they intend to vote for a separate withdrawal measure, and several others have signed on as supporters of a bipartisan bill to implement a series of changes recommended last winter by the Iraqi Study Group.
Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., who announced his intention to seek a change in policy last week, issued a statement that said the administration’s most recent assessment “confirms my worst fears that while the Iraqi government is making some progress on some benchmarks, it’s not moving fast enough to make meaningful or lasting progress.”
Even so, it appears the president’s allies have the support to block a final Senate vote in a showdown expected next week.
If the report changed any minds in Congress, it was not immediately apparent.
“It is time for the president to listen to the American people and do what is necessary to protect this nation. That means admitting his Iraq policy has failed, working with the Democrats and Republicans in Congress on crafting a new way forward in Iraq and refocusing our collective efforts on defeating al-Qaida,” said Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.
But Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, said Congress has already decided it will be September before the administration’s strategy can be evaluated properly. “Certainly the young soldiers and Marines risking their lives today on the streets of Baghdad and Ramadi would agree — and they deserve our patience.”


On the Net:
White House interim progress report on Iraq:

Now, as I have said before, the problem we have here people, is the good news that is happening over in Iraq is totally being ignored by the mainstream media and is not being reported at all.

When it comes to what is happening over there, we NEED to be hearing of the bad that is happening, AND we also need to hear about the good. And there is a lot of good happening over there that none of us are hearing! And this is wrong in so many ways. The press is liberal to the core and what the Liberals in our government are doing by trying to get the fairness doctrine passed so that they can find another way to break into talk radio by making it a law so that they can get their opinions across. They can’t seem to do it any other way.

Talk radio for the liberals was a dismal failure, and since they couldn’t succeed by using their own ideas, they are trying to make a law so that we will have to listen to their ideas, whether or not we want to hear them.

I for one hope that they do not succeed in that because if they do, people like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity would be made against the law, because they are conservative and speak of that. Rush doesn’t have guests on his show, so there are no liberal opinions on his show. And if they succeed, blogs would be next, and the only ones that will be allowed to be around are the liberal ones.

Now I know that some of you out there would love that to happen, but mark my words people, if it does we are in for some bad times. And whether or not it happens….the rough times are here….and will continue until we get our act straight and get the politicians to start listening to us…….which they need to do. Until then, we need to do the best we can to keep this country strong, support our troops in their mission, and even write them and let them know that they are appreciated and loved for the sacrifices that they are going through. Let the president know that we do not support what he is after and that he needs to secure our borders, and win this war. God Bless us all.

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops
God Bless my Readers


Where is the Consistency in what they say…? Oh yes, there isn’t any…..execpt….

In the news today was a story on that was all about what a Democrat says about what President Bush did with the Scooter Libby thing. Here is what it says:

Rep. Conyers Wants Bush to Explain Why He Commuted Libby’s Prison Sentence

Monday , July 09, 2007

House Judiciary Chairman John Conyers exhorted President Bush Monday to allow top aides to explain to Congress why Bush commuted I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby’s prison sentence.
In a letter to Bush on Monday, Conyers said the commutation was troubling and could eliminate Libby’s incentive to provide information about the administration’s role in leaking the identity of former CIA officer Valerie Plame Wilson.
Libby, who was a top aide to Vice President Dick Cheney, was sentenced to 2 1/2 years in prison for obstructing justice in a federal probe of the leak.
Bush, calling the sentence excessive, used his executive authority last week to commute the sentence, sparing Libby from prison.
Conyers, D-Mich., urged Bush “to waive Executive Privilege and provide the relevant documents and testimony of any relevant aides regarding your decision to commute Mr. Libby’s sentence.”
The congressman said that his committee on Wednesday will hold a hearing to “explore the grave questions that arise when the Presidential clemency power is used to erase criminal penalties for high-ranking executive branch employees whose offenses relate to their work for the President.”
Conyers acknowledged that President Clinton pardoned Marc Rich, whose ex-wife was a major Clinton campaign donor. But Clinton waived executive privilege and allowed top aides to testify before Congress about that matter, Conyers noted in his letter.
The White House did not have an immediate response to the letter.
In another development, White House counsel Fred Fielding told U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton that the confusion over Libby’s commuted sentence is unnecessary.
Bush forced the CIA leak case into uncharted legal territory last week when he commuted Libby’s prison term. The president wiped away the sentence but left in place Libby’s two years of supervised release.
But supervised release — a form of probation — is available only to people who have served prison time. Without prison, Walton had said earlier, it’s unclear what happens next.
Walton said in court documents that the law “does not appear to contemplate a situation in which a defendant may be placed under supervised release without first completing a term of incarceration.”
In a letter to the judge, Fielding said that Libby should simply report to probation officers as if he was recently released from prison. Under supervised release, Libby would have to submit written reports to probation officers each month and secure full-time employment. He would be prohibited from traveling without permission.
Libby has already paid a $250,000 fine.
Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald and Libby’s attorneys were also expected to weigh in on the confusion Monday.

Now I have some major problems with the Democrats here. And what they are doing with this Scooter Libby thing shows just how much contempt they actually have for the president. They want to know just why President Bush commuted Libby’s sentence, some even going so far as to say that President Bush gave him clemency. Well, he didn’t.

President Bush, unlike Clinton, didn’t pardon Scooter Libby. Mr. Libby still has the fines to pay for this, which he already has, and it is still on his record, and he has lost his career over this, and he shouldn’t have. Mr. Libby did nothing wrong but have a faulty memory after several years passed….and who of us can remember everything that happened years ago?

The other day, Mrs. Hillary Clinton (yes I called her Mrs Clinton because now it is convenient for her to be married to Bill for her campaign sake) said it was elevating cronyism over the rule of law. You can see what this woman says on YouTube.

The problem is, during her husbands presidency, Bill actually pardoned over 200 people in the last 24 hours of his presidency, and Hillary had a hand in a lot of those. People who included Bills brother for things far worse than Scooter Libby ever did. No one questioned Bill! Well, of course not. He was a democrat and nothing they do is wrong. NOT!!!!!!

Now I am getting very tired of the Clintons and their double standards. They both have them. Nothing a Republican does is right. Nothing, in their eyes….and their hatred of Bush knows no bounds. They are the same as most of your front running Democrats. Kerry, Kennedy, Murtha, Palosi, need I go on?

What I have to say to Hellery, and the rest of the Democrats is this…..look into your own backgrounds before you bring up “cronyism”, a word that shouldn’t even apply here.

Mrs. Clinton, you have whitewater and other things in your past that haven’t been cleared up…..and your husband Bill, purjured himself when it came to Monica, and you stood by him, when he gave the nation a new meaning to Oral Sex. Hell anymore, it isn’t sex anymore is it?!?!

So, before your open your mouths and put your big feet in it or something else, think before you rant. Might save you a little embarrassment later on….because there will be some.

President Bush did the right thing by commuting the sentence, as Scooter Libby did nothing wrong. But what he did do wrong, was he didn’t pardon him…..which he should have done.

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops
God Bless my Readers


The BIG day is here…..

Well, the big day is here,and in a few hours, I will be married to the best woman in the world. Here I am sitting at my computer working not only here but on my new computer to get it ready to take over the internet duties that this computer has always done….this one being retired to only doing the graphics of my business from now on.

I am listening to the girls fighting upstairs, Ariel crying as usual, and nothing from Rhiannon. Yelling at them to stop and quiet down never seems to help, as they have a penchance for fighting it seems…..but life goes on.

In their own little ways, they remind me of the fighting and bickering that our government officials do on a daily basis.

The Republicans, have a base in morality, religion and common sense, though for some stupid reason, don’t have the backbone to back their reasoning up with action.

The Democrats, on the other hand, have leadership written all over them, as they do whatever they can do to get their agenda’s passed into law, no matter how wrong they are. On this side, there is no common sense, no thoughts for the long range scheme of things…they don’t care for that, or for our future. They just want power. Pure, unadulterated power. In that, these people are scary as hell because if they get it, they will do anything they can to keep it, except do the right thing.

Now because of the reasons that I have listed here, right now neither one of these parties are FIT TO RUN OUR GOVERNMENT! Like I said, the Republicans have a base on the ideas that could get us out of trouble, fix our problems and get America back to the strong nation that is respected by the world again, but they don’t have the cahones to do the right thing. The Democrats do not have the right ideas, and their ideas could destroy America and has been for the last 50 years, but they DO have the cahones to do what they want.

The best thing we can do now, is to try to get an Independant or a Libertarian in there to shake things up a bit. Get the two main parties back on track if that is possible. Not sure that it is.

We can only hope and pray that something happens to straighten these arrogant assholes in Washington up and make them do what the people want them to do. And that is do what is right for America.

The problem is, even when we speak up, like we did with this Immigration Reform bill that was shot down this last month, they still do not see that they are on the wrong side of things, with President Bush still pushing for it, and the Democrats still pushing for it…..just like we didn’t even speak against it. We need to get rid of the whole lot of them……and start from scratch. Get some new blood in there to get the right things rolling again.

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops
God Bless my Readers