So, what are we to do? We need to listen and listen hard, and definitely NOT FORGET what they said in former speeches. To realise what the Democrats actually stand for, you have to see both sides of what they say. And there are always two sides to what they say!
We can start with Ms. Namby-Pamby Palosie (Nancy Palosi) and, we can work down the list if you have too. They are all the same. *Actually most elected officials after a time are the same way.* Give a listen:
December 16, 1998 – “Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
October 10, 2002 – “Yes, he has chemical weapons. Yes, he has biological weapons. He is trying to get nuclear weapons.”
But that was before this year. Now they are playing a different tune. Wars do not, and I repeat here….DO NOT stay the same course through out the war. World War 1 and World War 2 took on different courses during the course of the wars, but the courses always tried to find the best way to victory for us and the allies fighting the war. The difference now is this. The different courses that the democrats want to use are not for victory for us, (because they don’t think that victory is possible, just the same as their thoughts for Vietnam) but their course of action is to “Cut and Run”, or in their words, Redeploy out of Iraq….now isn’t that the same thing as “cutting and running”? Of course it is. But, that isn’t how the democrats see it. The sad part is, they actually see it as ‘we are too weak to win, so in order to not lose, let’s quit!’ No wonder the world laughs at us when we try to help a country anymore! Quiting and redeployment are the same, in almost any language. It is losing!
Now Ms. Pelosi is saying that the sooner we get out of Iraq the better. She actually had to cahones to say that Iraq is ‘not a war, but a situation that has to be resolved!’
Well, I have some words for you Ms Pelosi! This is a War. And one that we have to win. Before you and your cronies got into power, when this thing first started, you all thought so too, before you started believing your pointless and fake polls that said the opposite. You people are disgusting and do not have the best interest of the United States in your agenda’s. All I can say is thank GOD that you were not in charge when we were fighting against Imperialist Japan and Hitler’s Germany in world war two or we would be living in a drastically different and scary world today. Cause we would have lost that war!
And when it comes to the constitution? Here are her views on this and what she wants to do:
After all, the US Constitution defines what entities get representation in the House and Senate. Pelosi wants to change that by statute.
U.S. Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the incoming speaker of the House of Representatives, supports District voting rights and is a co-sponsor of legislation that would give Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) a full vote in the House, a spokeswoman said yesterday. If Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton was a Republican, I bet she wouldn’t want that representation being given out! She is just trying to widen the democrats control by giving another democrat say in what is going on.
The statement from Pelosi’s office clarified her position after heated discussion on Washington Post Radio about her position on the issue. On Thursday, Pelosi said she would change House rules on the first day of the new Democratic-controlled session in January so that Norton could vote on proposed changes but not final approval of legislation on the House floor. That would be a temporary measure, Norton said.
“She wants D.C. to have full voting rights in the House,” said Jennifer Crider, a spokeswoman for Pelosi (D-Calif.). “She doesn’t co-sponsor many pieces of legislation.”
The District of Columbia is not a state. It is therefore ineligible to have a voting representative in Congress –period.
Indeed, there are only three legitimate avenues available to accomplish that end.
The first is to admit the District of Columbia as a state — which would upset the Founders’ desire to not have the nation’s capital in any state or other jurisdiction outside of control of the Federal government. In addition, since the District is territory ceded by the state of Maryland for purposes of establishing a capital city, that state would need to grant permission for any such move.
The second would be to amend the Constitution to permit such representation without statehood — something that I do not see as being possible politically.
The third would be to allow the District of Columbia to be counted as a part of Maryland for purposes of representation in the House of Representatives, and for residents of the District of Columbia to vote in Maryland’s Senatorial and Congressional elections.
But the solution proposed at this time is unacceptable from a Constitutional standpoint — and Pelosi’s championing of it bodes ill for the level of respect to be given the Constitution over the next two years.
You do not consult your constituants, which by the way are us, the common people of whom you are supposed to be there to represent! But you care nothing for what we want…only what you think. And that is just sick!
Even with John Kerry I can find the same things that have been documented. His “I was for the war before I was against the war,” rhetoric has made me sick. And Dick Durbin, Howard Dean, Chuck Schumer, John Murtha, and Teddy Kennedy have all done the same things. They swing with the polls….polls that they create and try to make us think that they are telling the true mood of America, when all it really comes down to is this: They have no clue as to what the average American wants. God help us…….
God Bless America
God Bless our Troops
God Bless us All….
*the quotes by Nancy Pelosi and the statistics and stuff not in blue on what she thinks and wants to do, come from http://nancypelosistinks.com/?OVRAW=Nancy%20Pelosi&OVKEY=nancy%20pelosi&OVMTC=standard*